The purpose of this survey was to gather specific information from Iowans about their opinions on how cell phones work within the E911 Systems.
An effort was made to provide the survey to all PSAPS in Iowa, in addition Emergency Managers, attendees at the fall APCO/E911 Conference, and participants of several internet list serves were provided the survey information, and asked to assist, or to facilitate its completion. Each county was asked to gather 50 responses. This would generate approximately a total 5,000 responses. It is accurate to say all 99 counties were provided the opportunity to participate. The method for gathering the data was left up to each individual entity. We are aware that the results are a compilation of direct contact, phone surveys, surveys made in grocery stores, malls and at county or regional meetings.
The original submissions are available for independent review and validation. Information obtained including names, phone numbers, and specific locations were gathered to provide interested parties the opportunity to validate the responses. The originals can be obtained by contacting:
Bob Seivert, President
Iowa APCO
612 Court St.
Harlan, IA 51537
Every attempt has been made to provide an accurate accounting of the participants responses. The conclusion of the results and how it impacts the provision of wireless 911 are those of the author. They do not reflect specifically the E911 Council or IOWA APCO’s interpretation of the results. Each agency and each reader can infer their own conclusions from the information gathered.
Bob Seivert
This
represents 52 entities, some counties submitted surveys from more than one
agency in that county. A good variety of rural and urban areas responded. Not
all people responded to all questions.
It has been said that approx 1/3 of Iowans own cell phones. This can be verified by the amount of wireless surcharge collected. It can therefore be expected that a random sampling of Iowans should generate a response of approx 33%
2,134 of the
2,514 respondents reported
owning a cell phone.
This represents 84.9%. Some surveys were returned showing all of those surveyed owned cell phones.
Conclusion:
The number of cell
phones is likely higher than 33%, although it is not near the survey total of
84.9%. The number of respondents should therefore be more indicative of people
who actually own cell phones.

% of Iowans surveyed who own cell phones
Page 1 of 6
2. Was personal safety a consideration when you
purchased your cell phone? 1,787
(yes) 352 (no)
It is a selling point for cell phone
companies and it is often stated by E911 administrators that the majority of
cell phones are being purchased for “safety” reasons.
1,787 of the
2,139 people who own a cell
phone purchased it with some type of personal safety in mind. This represents
83.5%
Conclusion:
A
significant number of people who use cell phones and purchase cell phones do so
to increase their access to public safety services(911).

% of Iowans who use cell phones for personal
safety
Page
2 of 6
3. If you have to dial 911 to report an
emergency with your cell phone do you think the dispatcher knows your location? 502 (yes) 1,630 (no)
Commonly stated, is that most people think,
when using their cell phones, and calling 911 the dispatcher does know their
location and that most people do not recognize the difference between landline
and wireless E911 services.
This is a surprising survey result. Only 502
of 2,132 people 23.5% expected the 911 dispatcher to know the location from which they are calling.
Conclusion:
Efforts by cell phone providers, APCO, NENA,
Iowa E911 Council, and local 911 Boards to educate the public on the lack of
location being provided by cell phones, as comparable to landline traditional
telephone service providers, is
successful. The results further illustrate that the survey participants are
well informed and knowledgeable of the capability of cell phones as they relate
to the use of 911.

% of Iowans who know that cell phones do not
show location
Page
3 of 6
4. Would you be willing to pay an additional 50
cents per month on your cell phone bill to have your location displayed when
you call 911? 1,823 (yes) 310 (no)
The question is significant in the face of
deepening state and local budget crisis. Any tax increase, whether it is sold
as user fees or a special user charge, is not a popular proposal. It increases
the cost of cell phone users’ monthly bills. It is not a popular topic among
legislators or taxpayers. It is often stated, now is not the time to be asking
for this or any other type of tax or fee increase.
Overwhelmingly, 1,823 of the 2,133 people who
own cell phones indicated that 50 cents is not too much to pay, this represents
85.5%
Conclusion:
As many issues ultimately do, the cell phone
E911 issue boils down to money. This is a definitive answer for decision makers
that Iowans are willing to pay to have
911 dispatchers know their location when using 911 to report an emergency with
a cell phone. This question bears even more significance when compared to the
number of Iowans (76%) who know their cell phones do not now provide 911
dispatchers with their location. It
lends credibility to the fact the survey is representative of Iowans educated
on the issue.

No
Yes
% of Iowans willing to pay extra so 911 knows
their location.
Page
4 of 6
Age of Respondents:

Primary Occupation:
An attempt was made to survey a wide variety
of Iowans. We did not attempt to survey only people who are involved in public
safety fields. Participants were asked their occupation, and the survey results
reflect such a wide variety that inclusion in a meaningful form here is
challenging. The occupations are
available for review, if you would like to interpret them independently.
Overall
Conclusion
Iowans are knowledgeable about how 911 is
different with wireless phones than with landline phones. They recognize the need
for 911 centers to know where they are when they call 911. Iowans know there is
a cost, and support paying an additional 50 cents per month per cell phone. It
is, in every aspect, an inexpensive insurance which can save lives and protect
property.
Page
5 of 6
Shelby
Co List of
Survey Contributors
Pottawattamie
Co
Dubuque
Co
Poweshiek
Co
Mitchell
Co
Iowa
Co
Guthrie
CO
Clinton
CO
Story
CO
Lee
CO
Indianola
Ottumwa
Webster
Co
Appanoose
CO
Shenandoah
Pocahontas
Co
Johnson
co
Howard
Co
Cerro
Gordo Co
Henry
Co
Scott
Co
Buchanan
Co
Freemont
Co
Maquoketa
Muscatine
Cedar
CO
Sheldon
Boone
Co
Palo
Alto Co
Forest
City
Ft.
Madison
Allamakee
CO
ISAC
Fall Conference participants
Mason
City
Obrien
Co
Fayette
Co
Washington
Co
Monroe
Co
Carroll
Co
Montgomery
Co
Keokuk
Mills
Co
Jones
Co
Charles
City
Hardin
Co
Dallas
Co
Delaware
Co
Kossuth
Co
Black
Hawk Co
Ringgold
Co Page
6 of 6